Log in

You are here

Editor's Picks

Group photo at Harvard Herbarium
The Harvard University Herbaria hosted a novel Oak Taxonomy...
Jeannine Cavender-Bares | Apr 21, 2026
Morgan and friends in Argentina
Visits to three collections of Quercus in Buenos Aires...
Morgan Santini | Apr 05, 2026
Michel Duhart and Paco Garin at Jardín Botánico Wilson, Costa Rica
On April 1st, the very day he turned 103, a great friend...
Francisco Garin Garcia | Apr 05, 2026

Plant Focus

Quercus orocantabrica
Roderick Cameron and Carlos Vila-Viçosa give an account of this intriguing species from northwestern Iberia with a complex taxonomic and...

Unraveling the Mystery of Quercus ×introgressa P.M. Thomson - Part 2

In the Volume 19, No. 1 issue of Oak News & Notes, I wrote of my crusade to find and preserve Q. ×introgressa. A quick recap: this hybrid was described from a single location in Missouri and soon after was destroyed for a building project. I suppose I felt the need to track this plant down as it was originally found only an hour away from my home, and the thought of losing it entirely was not something I could stand. Nearly five years of searching had led only to one questionable grafted tree and a score of undocumented seedlings that looked spot-on for Q. bicolor.

introgressa1
Putative Quercus ×introgressa in Concordia, MO

Following a tip from Phil Stark of Kansas, I made a phone call to Jon Petersen of Concordia, Missouri. Concordia is the town where the hybrid was originally found, so it was a promising lead. I met with Jon and his brother Mark, on their family farm just outside of Concordia. They showed me two trees growing together alongside the road that were planted by their father, Marvin, about 30 years prior. The brothers told me the story of their father, who worked at the Concordia rest stop where the trees were found.  They told me that their dad dug these trees as seedlings from among the hybrid swarm. These were the first trees I had laid eyes on that had direct ties to the original site. Looking these trees over, it was apparent that both had an affinity towards Q. bicolor, but neither fit within the morphological range of pure Q. bicolor. I collected herbarium specimens from each tree, cupules, and a few remaining acorns.

introgressa2
Leaves of putative Quercus ×introgressa

Mark mentioned that there was another one of these trees planted by their father on the property, and when Paul Thomson visited a couple of years ago, he thought that this tree was the most like the hybrid he described in the 1970s. We drove to that tree and it again showed an obvious affinity with Q. bicolor, but its leaves were smaller, and a bit narrower; more like the leaves Thomson showed on the plate in his original publication. I collected herbarium specimens from this tree and found a few cupules and one remaining acorn. The Petersen brothers have collected acorns from these trees for several years and sent them to the Missouri Department of Conservation’s State Nursery in Licking, MO to raise and sell to Missouri landowners. Unfortunately, this trip was too late in the season to find acorns still on the trees, and while the Petersens had picked up several gallons of acorns from these trees, I didn’t take any as it would have been impossible to determine which tree they came from. I collected scion from each tree and plan to graft a number of each of these trees so I can grow them much closer to home to evaluate them easier.

introgressa3
Trunk of putative Quercus ×introgressa

The most exciting part of this trip wasn’t finding these trees, which may sound odd. Of course, this was very exciting, but it was the tree that I almost didn’t see that was the best part. Many people have expressed a certain amount of doubt (myself included) about Thomson’s theory that one half of this hybrid was a hybrid itself (Q. prinoides × muehlenbergii). These two species can be difficult enough to tell apart and nearly impossible in a three-way hybrid. So, even though I had found trees that I could tie directly to the original collection site, there was no way to positively tell if the trees I had found were actually the three-way hybrid that Thomson named Q. ×introgressa.

prinoides1
Putative Quercus prinoides × muehlenbergii

As I was leaving, Mark made an off-hand comment that his dad had also planted a chinkapin oak (Q. muehlenbergii) near the lake and wondered if I’d like to see it. It was on the way out so I said yes. As I casually looked at this “chinkapin” oak, it dawned on me that I was looking at a putative Q. prinoides × muehlenbergii hybrid, and better yet, the brothers think that their father took this tree from the original site. Admittedly, I am inferring some of this information as Marvin passed away in 2007 and I cannot ask him more specific details. However, if my suspicions check out, I believe it can be concluded with a certain amount of confidence that the three trees suspected as being Q. ×introgressa on the Petersen property are the real deal. I will await confirmation from real experts before I call this hunt a success. Andrew Hipp from The Morton Arboretum has agreed to analyze the specimens and report his findings. Perhaps this story will have a happy ending after all.

prinoides2
Above: Leaves of putative Quercus prinoides × muehlenbergii
Below: Jon and Mark Petersen of Concordia, MO
peteresens