Log in

Editor's Picks

Allan Taylor
A long-standing member of the IOS and fomer editor of Oak...
Panayoti Kelaidis | Dec 17, 2022
img_1085.jpg
A new study resolves many nomenclatural problems in the...
Carlos Vila-Viçosa | Dec 09, 2022
The team at SDZWA
Christy Powell of the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance works...
Amy Byrne | Dec 06, 2022

Plant Focus

Quercus macdougallii
A rare oak endemic to the Sierra Juárez in Oaxaca

Linking Science and Practice for Oak Ecosystem Recovery in the Chicago Wilderness Region

PDF icon Log in or register to access the full text.

Melissa Custic, Charles H. Cannon, Emily Okallau, and Lydia Scott1

Published May 2018 in International Oaks No. 29: 99–112

Abstract

The Oak Ecosystem Recovery Plan (OERP) aims to preserve, protect, and enhance the resiliency and integrity of oak ecosystems in the Chicago Wilderness Region through collaborative management practices and policies. Identifying best practices requires translating the current state of scientific knowledge into feasible actions that can be performed by a range of land managers, public or private. The impact of these actions should then direct future research. In reality, direct communication between scientists and land managers is rare. To facilitate a dialogue between these two communities, The Morton Arboretum hosted the Midwest Oak Ecosystem Managers and Scientists Meeting. First, we surveyed land managers to determine the major topics of concern from their perspective. Their responses were forwarded to the scientists to find commonalities and overlap with their research efforts. During the meeting, the two groups discussed the OERP generally and split into focus groups on high-priority topics. Several key outcomes are: 1) ground-truthing of the quality and condition of mapped “core” oak ecosystems and their environs is needed; 2) private landowners must be part of the dialogue; 3) potential impacts of climate change should be incorporated into management plans; and 4) management objectives should work positively across geographic scales, from landscape to oak remnant.

Keywords

Oak Ecosystem Recovery Plan, land management, oaks, Quercus

References

Arthur, M.A., H.D. Alexander, D.C. Dey, C.J. Schweitzer, and D.L. Loftis. 2012. Refining the oak-fire hypothesis for management of oak-dominated forests of the eastern United States. Journal of Forestry 110(5): 257-266.

Bischoff, L.T., and R.H.G. Jongman.1993. Development of rural areas in Europe:   the claim for nature. Preliminary and background studies no. V79. Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy. SDU Publishers. The Hague.

Chicago Wilderness. 2004. Chicago Wilderness Green Infrastructure Vision: Final Report.

Christensen, N.L., A.M. Bartuska, J.H. Brown, S. Carpenter, C. D’Antonio, R. Francis, J.F. Franklin, J.A. MacMahon, R.F. Noss, D.J. Parsons, C.H. Peterson, M.G. Turner, and R.G. Woodmansee. 1996. The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management. Ecological Applications 6(3): 665-91. doi:10.2307/2269460.

Dettman, C.L., and C.M. Mabry. 2008. Lessons Learned about Research and Management: A Case Study from a Midwest Lowland Savanna, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 16: 532–541. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00478.x

Dey, D.C. 2014. Sustaining oak forests in eastern North America: Regeneration and recruitment, the pillars of sustainability. Forest Science 60(5): 926-942.

Fahey, R.T., L. Darling, and J. Anderson. 2015. Oak Ecosystems Recovery Plan: Sustaining Oaks in the Chicago Wilderness Region. Chicago Wilderness.

Knoot, T.G., L.A. Schulte, and M. Rickenbach. 2010. Oak Conservation and Restoration on Private Forestlands: Negotiating a Social-Ecological Landscape. Environmental Management 45: 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9404-7

Michael, J., and W. Tietje. 2008. Bird Use of Lone Oak Trees in Vineyard vs. Savanna in Central-Coastal California Woodland – A Pilot Study. Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 44: 37-42.

Noss R.F., and C.D. Harris. 1986. Nodes, Networks, and MUMs: Preserving Diversity at All Scales. Environmental Management 10: 299-309.

Smith, W.B., P.D. Miles, C.H. Perry, and S.A. Pugh. 2009. Forest Resources of the United States 2007. General Technical Report WO-78. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.